Posted by Bryan Jones on April 18, 2013 
It was actually the "stealth" gray paint scheme, most commonly seen on the first order of GE C40-8's, which caused such uproar in the railfan community. The blue and gray variation found on this quartet of U30C's was the precursor to the short lived stealth scheme which featured a solid gray carbody and blue running gear.
Posted by Art House on April 18, 2013 
The truly ill-conceived paint scheme was that which followed: the all gray "Stealth" scheme. For a time, I stopped taking photos on CSX as a result. Thank heavens for the following YN1 and YN2 schemes.
Posted by Chuggalugg45 on April 18, 2013 
These U30C's are probably on one of there last trips being I believe L&N bought these beauties, and now It's amazing how the trains today used to require three or four locomotives and now two AC4400's or ES44AC's take the train on no problem! I don't dislike any CSX scheme, especially if it was applied to former Seaboard stuff.
Posted by Chris Egghart on April 18, 2013 
Yes, the "Stealth" scheme was even worse. I consider it beneath comment; like it never even existed. The scheme spoke volumes of what the management at the time thought of its corporate public image and crew morale. I won't even touch on the operational safety aspects. I truly believe that the loud, justified and immediate outcry in the fan-orientated press helped get rid of it.
Posted by Scott Haugland on April 18, 2013 
Oops, looks like the engineer forgot to turn off the "coalers"! When coal is abundant guess you use that instead of sand for traction. Just kidding of course.
- Post a Comment -